← Chlorine in Tap Water

Disinfection Byproducts and Health Risks

How chlorination protects against pathogens but generates trihalomethanes and other byproducts linked to bladder cancer, reproductive harm, and skin disruption — and what to do about it

Chlorine is added to municipal tap water to kill bacteria and viruses — and it works. Before water chlorination became widespread in the early 20th century, waterborne diseases like cholera and typhoid were common causes of death. But chlorine does not simply disappear after doing its job. It reacts with organic matter naturally present in water to form a family of chemical byproducts called trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids, which are now the most extensively studied contaminants in treated drinking water [1]. Long-term exposure to elevated THM levels has been consistently associated with increased bladder cancer risk in epidemiological research, and emerging evidence points to reproductive harm and skin effects as well [2][3].

How Disinfection Byproducts Form

When chlorine is added to water, it reacts with naturally occurring organic compounds — decomposing plant matter, algae metabolites, humic acids — to form chlorinated compounds. The main groups are:

  • Trihalomethanes (THMs): Chloroform, bromodichloromethane, dibromochloromethane, and bromoform. These are volatile — they evaporate readily and can be inhaled during showering or absorbed through the skin in addition to being consumed in drinking water.
  • Haloacetic acids (HAAs): Less volatile but also regulated under the U.S. Safe Drinking Water Act. More water-soluble and primarily ingested.
  • Chlorate and chlorite: Formed when chlorine dioxide is used as a disinfectant (a practice in some European systems).

THM concentrations in tap water depend on several factors: the amount of organic matter in the source water, the season (warmer temperatures accelerate byproduct formation), water pH, and disinfectant dose. Levels vary widely — some systems routinely stay well below regulatory limits while others approach or exceed them.

The Bladder Cancer Connection

Of all the health effects studied in relation to THMs, bladder cancer has the most robust epidemiological support. Bladder cancer is the sixth most common cancer in the United States, and the bladder's role in concentrating urine means prolonged contact time with any water-derived contaminant.

A 2003 meta-analysis synthesizing the best available case-control studies found that long-term consumption of chlorinated drinking water was associated with bladder cancer in men, with consistent findings across multiple study populations [1]. A landmark 2020 study estimated that THMs in drinking water are attributable to approximately 4.9% of bladder cancer cases across the European Union — roughly 6,500 additional cases per year [2]. In countries with the highest THM levels, the attributable fraction exceeded 17%.

The relationship appears stronger for men than women, possibly due to differences in fluid intake, bladder anatomy, or metabolic activation of THM compounds. Risk is primarily associated with long-term, high-level exposure — occasional consumption of tap water is very different from drinking it exclusively over decades.

Reproductive and Developmental Concerns

A second area of active research involves pregnancy outcomes. Several studies have observed associations between elevated THM exposure during pregnancy and increased rates of miscarriage, low birth weight, and certain congenital anomalies. A population-based Italian case-control study found that chlorite and chlorate exposure via drinking water was associated with neural tube defects, cardiac anomalies, and urinary tract malformations, though THM levels in that study were low [4]. Systematic reviews of the broader literature have found consistent, if modest, associations between THM exposure and small-for-gestational-age births and preterm delivery, particularly at THM concentrations exceeding 50 µg/L.

For pregnant women, the precautionary principle argues for using filtered water during the first trimester, when organogenesis is most sensitive to chemical exposures.

Showering and Skin Exposure

Drinking is not the only route of exposure. THMs are volatile — they evaporate rapidly from warm water, making a hot shower an inhalation event as well as a dermal exposure event. Some researchers have argued that showering in chlorinated water may contribute more to blood THM levels than drinking it, because the lungs absorb volatile compounds efficiently and gut metabolism partially degrades THMs before they reach systemic circulation.

Chlorine also directly affects skin health. Research has shown that even low concentrations of residual chlorine in bathing water reduce the water-holding capacity of the stratum corneum — the skin's outer barrier layer — particularly in people with atopic dermatitis [5]. Chlorine strips natural oils and disrupts the skin's acid mantle, which can exacerbate eczema, increase transepidermal water loss, and alter the skin microbiome by reducing beneficial bacterial populations.

What You Can Do

Reducing exposure to chlorine and its byproducts is straightforward with the right filtration. Key approaches:

  • Activated carbon filters (pitcher, under-sink, or whole-house) effectively remove THMs from drinking water. Look for NSF/ANSI Standard 53 certification.
  • Shower filters with activated carbon or KDF (kinetic degradation fluxion) media reduce chlorine at the point of contact. Less effective than whole-house carbon filters but meaningful for skin and inhalation exposure.
  • Whole-house carbon filtration addresses both drinking and bathing water in one system — the most comprehensive approach.
  • Letting water sit uncovered or running cold water briefly before using it allows some volatile THMs to off-gas, though this is an imperfect solution.

The goal is not to avoid all chlorinated water — the microbiological safety it provides is genuinely important. The goal is to reduce long-term exposure to byproducts, particularly for high-risk groups: pregnant women, people who drink large volumes of tap water, and those with skin conditions.

See our Water Filtration page for detailed filter comparisons, and our Lead in Water page for guidance on broader tap water safety.

Evidence Review

Bladder Cancer Meta-Analysis (Villanueva et al., 2003)

This meta-analysis pooled data from the best available epidemiological studies examining individual-level consumption of chlorinated drinking water and bladder cancer risk [1]. The analysis found a consistent, statistically significant association between long-term chlorinated water consumption and bladder cancer, particularly in men. The pooled evidence indicated that drinking chlorinated tap water over many years was associated with a meaningfully elevated risk compared to drinking non-chlorinated or filtered water. The meta-analysis was among the first to synthesize individual-level (rather than ecological) data, reducing the exposure misclassification that had limited earlier work. Limitations included heterogeneity across studies in how chlorinated water exposure was assessed and the challenge of reconstructing lifetime water sources from retrospective recall.

EU Bladder Cancer Burden (Villanueva et al., 2020)

This study collected recent annual mean THM concentration data from routine monitoring records across all 28 EU member states and applied epidemiological risk estimates to calculate population-attributable fractions for bladder cancer [2]. The estimated overall PAF was 4.9% (range: 0–23% by country), corresponding to approximately 6,561 attributable bladder cancer cases per year. Countries with the highest THM levels — Cyprus (23.2%), Malta (17.9%), and Ireland (17.2%) — had dramatically higher attributable fractions than countries with tighter water quality controls. The authors estimated that if no EU country exceeded the current mean THM level, roughly 2,868 annual bladder cancer cases could be avoided. The study used total THM4 as its exposure metric and the risk estimate from a pooled analysis of case-control studies, acknowledging that THM exposure is an imperfect proxy for the full mixture of DBPs that drive actual cancer risk.

Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis (Helte et al., 2025)

This comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis, published in Environmental Health Perspectives in 2025, evaluated 29 publications assessing associations between residential THM exposure and 14 different cancer types [3]. The review searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane through April 2024. For bladder cancer, limited-suggestive evidence (per World Cancer Research Fund criteria) was found that THM exposure increases risk at levels below current regulatory limits in both the US (maximum contaminant level: 80 µg/L) and EU. For colorectal cancer, the evidence was also categorized as limited-suggestive. A dose-response meta-analysis for bladder cancer found elevated risk particularly in men with THM4 exposures exceeding 50 µg/L. The authors noted that THMs serve as a marker for the broader DBP mixture and that isolating individual compounds' contributions remains methodologically challenging. Effect sizes for bladder cancer in men were generally in the range of 30–50% increased risk at high exposure levels, though confidence intervals were wide across individual studies.

Congenital Anomalies (Righi et al., 2012)

This population-based case-control study in Emilia-Romagna, Italy examined 1,917 congenital anomalies registered between 2002 and 2005 in relation to drinking water contaminants [4]. THM levels in this population were low (mean 3.8 µg/L), and no excess risk was associated with THM exposure at these levels. However, chlorite and chlorate — byproducts of chlorine dioxide disinfection used more commonly in European systems — were detected at substantially higher concentrations (mean 427 and 283 µg/L, respectively). Elevated chlorite and chlorate were associated with increased risk of several anomaly categories. The study was the first to report human data on chlorate and congenital anomalies, providing evidence that the specific disinfection chemistry used matters — not just the presence of chlorine. The authors called for further research and noted that chlorate remains unregulated in most countries despite animal data suggesting thyroid disruption at high doses.

Chlorine and Stratum Corneum (Seki et al., 2003)

This clinical study compared the effect of bathing water chlorine on skin barrier function between patients with atopic dermatitis and healthy controls [5]. Participants bathed in water with varying concentrations of free residual chlorine (0, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0 mg/L), and the water-holding capacity of the stratum corneum was assessed using a corneometer. Even at concentrations typical of municipal tap water (0.2–0.5 mg/L), free residual chlorine significantly reduced stratum corneum water-holding capacity in atopic skin, while healthy skin showed less pronounced effects at low concentrations. At 1.0 mg/L — not unusual in water as it leaves the treatment facility — reductions were significant in both groups. The findings provide mechanistic support for the observation that chlorinated tap water can exacerbate atopic dermatitis and dry skin conditions, and suggest that people with sensitive or compromised skin barriers may benefit meaningfully from chlorine-reducing shower filters.

References

  1. Meta-analysis of studies on individual consumption of chlorinated drinking water and bladder cancerVillanueva CM, Fernández F, Malats N, Grimalt JO, Kogevinas M. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2003. PubMed 12594192 →
  2. Trihalomethanes in Drinking Water and Bladder Cancer Burden in the European UnionVillanueva CM, Evlampidou I, Font-Ribera L, Rojas-Rueda D, Vineis P, Dora C, Leonardi GS, Minichilli F, Balbus J, Fletcher T. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2020. PubMed 31939704 →
  3. Exposure to Drinking Water Trihalomethanes and Risk of Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Epidemiologic Evidence and Dose-Response Meta-AnalysisHelte E, Söderlund F, Säve-Söderbergh M, Larsson SC, Åkesson A. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2025. PubMed 39837568 →
  4. Trihalomethanes, chlorite, chlorate in drinking water and risk of congenital anomalies: a population-based case-control study in Northern ItalyRighi E, Bechtold P, Tortorici D, Lauriola P, Calzolari E, Astolfi G, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Fantuzzi G, Aggazzotti G. Environmental Research, 2012. PubMed 22578809 →
  5. Free residual chlorine in bathing water reduces the water-holding capacity of the stratum corneum in atopic skinSeki T, Morimatsu S, Nagahori H, Morohashi M. Journal of Dermatology, 2003. PubMed 12692355 →

Weekly Research Digest

Get new topics and updated research delivered to your inbox.