Anxiety, stress, and emotional healing
How tapping on acupressure points while focusing on emotional distress calms the nervous system and reduces anxiety, stress, and PTSD symptoms.
EFT — Emotional Freedom Techniques, commonly called tapping — combines gentle tapping on specific acupressure points on the face and body with focused attention on a distressing thought or feeling. It sounds deceptively simple, yet more than 100 clinical trials have examined it, and the evidence for anxiety, PTSD, and stress reduction is substantial [5]. A single one-hour session has been shown in a randomized controlled trial to reduce cortisol by 24% and cut anxiety scores by more than half [1]. It requires no equipment, costs nothing, and can be learned in minutes.
What EFT is and where it comes from
EFT was developed in the 1990s by Gary Craig, drawing on earlier work in Applied Kinesiology and acupressure. Its theoretical basis combines two different frameworks: the cognitive-behavioral idea that deliberately and repeatedly pairing a feared stimulus with a calm physiological state extinguishes the fear response, and the traditional Chinese medicine model of meridian energy points. Whether you find the meridian model compelling or not, the clinical evidence for the technique's effects stands independently of the theoretical explanation. Researchers have proposed several mechanisms — downregulation of the amygdala response, vagal activation through facial tapping, and exposure-based conditioning — and the answer is probably a combination of all three.
The standard EFT protocol involves identifying a specific emotional problem or physical discomfort, rating its intensity on a scale of 0 to 10 (the Subjective Units of Distress Scale, or SUDS), setting up the issue with a verbal statement, and then tapping through a sequence of 8-14 acupressure points — typically including the side of the hand, eyebrow, outer eye, under-eye, under-nose, chin, collarbone, underarm, and top of the head — while staying mentally tuned to the problem. After one or two rounds, the SUDS rating is re-assessed and the process repeated until the distress diminishes.
What the research shows it helps
The evidence is strongest for the following conditions:
Anxiety. A meta-analysis of 14 studies found a large pre-to-post treatment effect size (d = 1.23), and EFT produced significantly greater anxiety reduction than control conditions even when accounting for control group effects [2]. The effects are consistent across different anxiety presentations — generalized anxiety, test anxiety, performance anxiety, and subclinical stress.
PTSD. A meta-analysis of seven studies comparing EFT to waitlist or standard care found a large treatment effect (d = 2.96, 95% CI 1.96–3.97) [3]. A course of 4 to 10 sessions was sufficient to produce clinically significant symptom reduction in populations including combat veterans, sexual violence survivors, and disaster survivors. No adverse effects were reported across trials.
Physiological stress markers. A controlled study measured heart rate variability, resting heart rate, blood pressure, cortisol, and salivary immunoglobulin A (immune function) before and after an EFT workshop. All markers improved significantly — cortisol fell, blood pressure normalized, immune function markers rose, and HRV improved [4]. These biological changes validate what the self-report data shows.
Depression, phobias, and cravings. The 2022 systematic review covering 56 RCTs and 2,013 participants found consistent evidence across depression, specific phobias, and even food cravings and weight management, in addition to the core anxiety and PTSD literature [5].
How cortisol responds to EFT
The Church et al. (2012) RCT is particularly notable because it used an objective biological endpoint — salivary cortisol — rather than relying on self-report alone [1]. Eighty-three subjects were randomly assigned to an EFT session, a psychoeducation (PE) session, or a no-treatment (NT) control. After one hour, the EFT group showed a 24.39% cortisol reduction compared to 14.25% in the PE group and 14.44% in the NT group. The EFT group also showed significantly greater reductions in anxiety (−58.34%), depression (−49.33%), and overall symptom severity (−50.5%). The magnitude of improvement in a single session is unusual in the stress literature.
How to practice EFT
The basic technique can be learned from any number of free resources. A typical session proceeds as follows:
- Identify a specific issue — not a general feeling like "stress" but a particular event, memory, or sensation ("the argument I had this morning," "the tightness in my chest when I think about the presentation").
- Rate the intensity from 0 (no distress) to 10 (maximum distress).
- Setup statement — while tapping the side of your hand (karate chop point), say three times: "Even though I have this [problem], I deeply and completely accept myself." The specific wording matters less than staying honestly tuned to the real feeling.
- Tap through the sequence — eyebrow, side of eye, under eye, under nose, chin, collarbone, underarm, top of head — about 5-7 taps on each point while saying a reminder phrase that keeps you focused on the issue.
- Re-rate — check the SUDS level again. Repeat until it reaches 0-2, or until you've addressed the different aspects of the problem.
Most people notice a shift within a round or two. Persistent or complex trauma typically benefits from working with a trained EFT practitioner. The Association for Comprehensive Energy Psychology (ACEP) maintains a practitioner directory.
Who it is most appropriate for
EFT is particularly useful as a self-help tool for subclinical anxiety, stress, and performance anxiety because it is fast, private, requires no referral, and can be deployed in the moment. For PTSD and trauma, it performs well in supervised settings, and several countries' health systems now include trained EFT practitioners in trauma care pathways. It is not a replacement for medical evaluation of anxiety disorders, and people with severe trauma histories are generally advised to work with a professional rather than self-applying the technique alone.
See our biofeedback page for another evidence-based approach to stress regulation, and our vagus nerve page for the underlying physiology behind why these techniques work.
Evidence Review
Cortisol and stress biochemistry: RCT
Church, Yount, and Brooks (2012) conducted a randomized controlled trial in which 83 non-clinical subjects were assigned to a one-hour session of EFT, psychoeducation (PE), or no treatment (NT) [1]. Salivary cortisol was measured at baseline and post-intervention. The EFT group showed a 24.39% reduction in cortisol compared to 14.25% (PE) and 14.44% (NT), a statistically significant difference (p < .03). Psychological symptom scales (including anxiety, depression, and global symptom severity) improved dramatically more in the EFT group: anxiety fell 58.34% in the EFT group versus 43.22% (PE) and 12.67% (NT). The use of an objective biomarker — cortisol — strengthens confidence in the self-report findings and provides mechanistic evidence for how a single EFT session produces the observed psychological changes.
Anxiety: systematic review and meta-analysis
Clond (2016) conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 14 studies investigating EFT for anxiety [2]. The pooled pre-to-post effect size for anxiety reduction was d = 1.23, classified as large. EFT produced significantly greater anxiety reduction than control conditions even after accounting for the effect size of control treatment. Subgroup analysis found consistent results across different anxiety presentations. The review noted that EFT's mechanism of combining somatic (tapping) and cognitive (verbal attention) components may be responsible for the larger effect sizes compared to either component alone. Methodological limitations noted include heterogeneous populations, varying EFT protocols, and predominantly non-blind study designs — constraints typical of behavioral intervention research.
PTSD: meta-analysis across populations
Sebastian and Nelms (2017) conducted a meta-analysis of seven RCTs examining EFT for PTSD, spanning combat veterans, sexual violence survivors, motor accident survivors, and natural disaster survivors [3]. The weighted Cohen's d for studies comparing EFT to waitlist or usual care was 2.96 (95% CI: 1.96–3.97, p < .001). Studies using 4 to 10 EFT sessions consistently achieved outcomes qualifying for PTSD remission on standard scales including the PCL (PTSD Checklist). No adverse effects were reported across any included trial. The large effect size places EFT's PTSD outcomes above those typically seen for pharmaceutical interventions and on par with the strongest behavioral interventions for trauma, though the authors caution that most trials were small (median n ≈ 30) and replication in larger samples is needed.
Multiple physiological markers: controlled study
Bach et al. (2019) conducted a controlled study measuring heart rate variability, resting heart rate, blood pressure, salivary cortisol, and salivary immunoglobulin A (SIgA, a marker of mucosal immune function) in participants before and after a clinical EFT workshop [4]. All measured markers improved significantly: cortisol fell, blood pressure normalized, HRV improved (indicating greater parasympathetic tone), resting heart rate decreased, and SIgA rose, suggesting improved mucosal immunity. The breadth of physiological changes — spanning the endocrine, cardiovascular, autonomic, and immune systems — suggests that EFT's effects are systemic rather than confined to the psychological domain. The study design was not fully randomized, limiting causal inference, but the biological findings provide a plausible substrate for the self-report benefit data.
2022 systematic review: 56 RCTs across conditions
Church, Stapleton, Vasudevan, and O'Keefe (2022) published the most comprehensive systematic review of EFT to date, identifying 56 RCTs (n = 2,013) and eight meta-analyses [5]. Forty-one of the included RCTs were published after a prior 2013 review, indicating rapid accumulation of evidence. RCTs found EFT effective for anxiety, depression, phobias, PTSD, pain, insomnia, autoimmune conditions, and sports and professional performance. Biological markers — cortisol, HRV, immune parameters, gene expression — were altered in the direction of improved health in physiological studies. The review concluded that Clinical EFT meets American Psychological Association criteria as an "efficacious" treatment for anxiety, depression, phobias, and PTSD, while acknowledging that most individual trials are underpowered and that replication in large independent trials remains the primary evidence gap.
References
- The effect of emotional freedom techniques on stress biochemistry: a randomized controlled trialChurch D, Yount G, Brooks AJ. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 2012. PubMed 22986277 →
- Emotional Freedom Techniques for Anxiety: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysisClond M. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 2016. PubMed 26894319 →
- The Effectiveness of Emotional Freedom Techniques in the Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Meta-AnalysisSebastian B, Nelms J. Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing, 2017. PubMed 27889444 →
- Clinical EFT (Emotional Freedom Techniques) Improves Multiple Physiological Markers of HealthBach D, Groesbeck G, Stapleton P, Sims R, Blickheuser K, Church D. Journal of Evidence-Based Integrative Medicine, 2019. PubMed 30777453 →
- Clinical EFT as an evidence-based practice for the treatment of psychological and physiological conditions: A systematic reviewChurch D, Stapleton P, Vasudevan A, O'Keefe T. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022. PubMed 36438382 →
Transparency
View edit historyEvery change to this page is tracked in version control. If you have conflicting research or think something is wrong, we want to hear about it.