Page history
What changed on How effective are non-hormonal birth control options like the copper IUD?, when, and why, including what we used to say.
Every edit to the source
- fix(content): answer-first wording follows the confidence scale in docs/answer-first-style.md c0ec7cc
- content: fix wrong PMIDs across all articles and fill the answer-first fields (#29) 52b480e
- feat(content): answer-first fields on all 927 existing articles 7ff832d
- fix(content): citation hygiene across ~215 articles cbb28e2
- fix(content): correct 351 PMIDs that pointed to the wrong paper c329548
- fix(citations): drop 281 PubMed IDs that resolve to a different paper 138835e
- fix(citations): point 480 references at the PubMed record of the paper they cite 020abfe
- fix(content): repair 536 broken internal links in 229 article bodies 6654a6c
- content: expand birth-control with two new subtopics — types-and-their-risks (per-method risk profile for the pill, mini-pill, patch, ring, Depo-Provera, Nexplanon, hormonal IUDs, copper IUD, emergency contraception, sterilization, and spermicides drawing on Skovlund 2016 PMID 27680324 for depressi… a4b9405
- feat: Medicine & Your Body section — 355 pages total 292c757